Shared project instructions
Give people and approved AI tools a consistent account of the product, its constraints, and the decisions already made.
Doers Circuit · For development teams using AI
Doers Circuit helps your development team use AI with shared instructions, coordinated changes, and clear review responsibilities. We adapt the approach to your tools and help your team put it into practice.
A service for your team—not another AI coding subscription.
When people and AI tools work on the same product, changes can overlap, instructions can become outdated, and review can take more effort than expected.
Circuit focuses on how the work fits together: what each change is meant to accomplish, what it can affect, who checks it, and who decides it is ready.
Give people and approved AI tools a consistent account of the product, its constraints, and the decisions already made.
Make overlapping work easier to identify and address before changes are combined.
Use appropriate testing and review for each change, with stronger checks when security, data, payments, or production behavior could be affected.
Keep people responsible for product decisions, engineering judgment, and release approval.
We review your current development process, agree where it needs attention, and introduce changes in a focused part of the work. Your team learns how to use and maintain the approach as it develops.
Improvement needs a relevant starting point. We look at the time and effort involved in review, correction, testing, and release, alongside the cost of tools and infrastructure.
Research about AI-assisted coding can help frame questions. It does not prove Circuit's results or guarantee savings for your team.
Technical details
Circuit is Doers' approach to coordinating AI-assisted development. It combines project instructions, working practices, and technical checks adapted to the client's environment. It is not sold as a hosted software subscription.
Where they meet the project's requirements. We assess the repositories, AI providers, delivery tools, and controls already in use before recommending changes.
The intended setup uses client-controlled systems, without a mandatory Doers-hosted runtime. Provider access, data handling, retention, and responsibilities are agreed before implementation.
People retain responsibility for product direction, sensitive access, production data, security, and release decisions. The permissions for AI-assisted work are defined for the environment rather than assumed from the tool's capabilities.
No. Review should reflect the consequence of a mistake. A small, reversible text change does not need the same process as a change to payments or shared data.
The agreed project instructions, checks, working practices, and documentation needed for the client team to maintain the setup. The exact deliverables and responsibilities are defined for the engagement.
Tell us about the tools you use and where review, coordination, or rework has become difficult.
Start a conversation Share a detailed team brief